Nursing Care Plan Assignment: Congestive Heart Failure

Nursing Care Plan Assignment: CHF Patient Scenario with NANDA Diagnoses

Assignment Overview

This BSN-level nursing care plan assignment showcases a complete congestive heart failure (CHF) case study for NUR 320: Adult Health Nursing. The sample demonstrates how to analyze patient assessment data, prioritize NANDA nursing diagnoses, write measurable outcomes, and map NIC interventions with evidence-based rationales that align with current American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines.

Course: NUR 320 – Adult Health Nursing | Author: Registered Nurse Educator | Instructor: Prof. L. Andrews, MSN, RN | Date: January 12, 2025

Key Care Plan Components

  • Comprehensive Assessment: Subjective complaints, objective findings, cardiac lab values, and telemetry interpretation for CHF.
  • Prioritized NANDA-I Diagnoses: Decreased cardiac output, impaired gas exchange, and excess fluid volume with defining characteristics.
  • SMART Outcomes: Patient-centered goals for ventilation, activity tolerance, and self-management within 24-72 hours.
  • NIC Interventions & Rationales: Medication management, oxygen therapy, fluid restriction, and patient education supported by current research.
  • Evaluation & Documentation: Progress notes, reassessment data, and interdisciplinary communication for safe discharge planning.

Introduction

Congestive heart failure nursing care plans are frequently assigned in adult health courses because they evaluate a student’s ability to synthesize assessment data, lab trends, and pathophysiology into prioritized nursing actions. This paper walks through a CHF patient scenario using the nursing process and ANA documentation standards.

CHF scenarios are a favorite teaching case specifically because the condition touches nearly every body system at once, cardiac, respiratory, renal, and fluid balance, forcing students to prioritize rather than address every abnormal finding with equal urgency. A care plan that lists every possible intervention without ranking them by clinical priority typically loses points even if each individual intervention is technically correct, which is why this sample places heavy emphasis on the reasoning behind the sequence of care, not just the list of actions itself.

Patient Assessment Summary

Mr. J., a 66-year-old male with a history of coronary artery disease, presents to the telemetry unit after experiencing shortness of breath and orthopnea. Assessment reveals jugular vein distention, +3 pitting edema in both legs, S3 gallop, and bibasilar crackles. Vital signs: BP 162/94 mmHg, HR 108 bpm, RR 26/min, SpO2 88% on room air, weight gain of 5.4 lb in three days. Labs show BNP 1,240 pg/mL, serum sodium 130 mEq/L, and potassium 3.4 mEq/L.

  • Subjective Data: “I wake up gasping for air,” reports paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, fatigue with minimal exertion.
  • Objective Data: Crackles in lower lobes, diminished breath sounds, abdominal distention, decreased urine output.
  • Psychosocial Note: Patient expresses frustration at repeated hospital readmissions and anxiety about returning home alone, a factor the care plan folds into the discharge and self-management teaching rather than treating as separate from the physical presentation.
  • Diagnostics: Chest X-ray indicating pulmonary congestion; echocardiogram EF 30%.

The 5.4-pound weight gain in three days is flagged as the single most clinically urgent data point in the assessment, more so than the BNP level, because rapid weight gain of this magnitude in a CHF patient typically precedes an acute decompensation event by 24 to 48 hours. The care plan uses this detail to justify why the nursing interventions prioritize fluid monitoring ahead of the other diagnoses rather than treating all three NANDA diagnoses as equally time-sensitive.

Priority NANDA Diagnoses

  1. Decreased Cardiac Output related to impaired myocardial contractility as evidenced by dyspnea, tachycardia, and reduced ejection fraction.
  2. Impaired Gas Exchange related to alveolar-capillary membrane changes secondary to pulmonary congestion as evidenced by SpO2 88% and crackles.
  3. Excess Fluid Volume related to compromised regulatory mechanisms as evidenced by edema, weight gain, and elevated BNP.

The ordering of these three diagnoses is not arbitrary. Decreased Cardiac Output is ranked first because it is the upstream cause driving both the gas exchange problem and the fluid volume excess, addressing it effectively should improve the other two, whereas treating fluid volume first without stabilizing cardiac output risks over-diuresing a patient whose heart is already struggling to maintain adequate perfusion.

Goals and Expected Outcomes

  • Patient will maintain SpO2 ≥ 94% on 2 L/min nasal cannula within 24 hours.
  • Patient will verbalize three strategies to monitor fluid status (daily weights, edema checks, sodium restriction) before discharge.
  • Patient will demonstrate stable cardiac rhythm and report improved activity tolerance within 48 hours.
  • Patient will identify one support resource, a family member, home health service, or outpatient heart failure clinic, to reduce the isolation contributing to his readmission anxiety.

Nursing Interventions & Rationales

  • Monitor hemodynamics: Continuous telemetry, frequent vital signs, strict I&O to evaluate response to diuretics (supports NOC: Cardiac Pump Effectiveness).
  • Administer prescribed medications: IV furosemide, ACE inhibitor, and beta-blocker per CHF protocol to reduce preload and afterload.
  • Provide oxygen therapy: Titrate nasal cannula, position in high Fowler’s, encourage incentive spirometry to optimize gas exchange.
  • Implement fluid and sodium restrictions: Collaborate with dietitian to maintain 2 g sodium diet and 1.5 L fluid limit; educate patient on label reading.
  • Teach self-management behaviors: Daily weight log, recognition of worsening symptoms, medication adherence, follow-up appointments.

The rationale behind sequencing IV furosemide before the ACE inhibitor is worth noting explicitly: administering the ACE inhibitor too early, before diuresis has begun reducing preload, risks a sharper drop in blood pressure given Mr. J.'s already elevated heart rate. The care plan schedules the ACE inhibitor once the first diuretic response is confirmed, illustrating how medication sequencing, not just medication selection, is part of safe CHF management.

Medication & Interdisciplinary Collaboration

Consulted cardiology and pharmacy to review medication titration. Coordinated with respiratory therapy for oxygen weaning and physical therapy for energy conservation techniques. Verified patient understanding of anticoagulation therapy and scheduled home health nursing for post-discharge monitoring.

The physical therapy referral is included specifically because CHF patients often equate rest with safety and become reluctant to move at all once symptomatic, which can accelerate deconditioning during a hospital stay. Energy conservation techniques, pacing activity, planning rest breaks around meals and hygiene, give Mr. J. a framework for staying mobile without triggering the exertional dyspnea that brought him to the unit in the first place.

Evaluation & Documentation

After 36 hours the patient maintained SpO2 95% on 1 L/min oxygen, weight decreased by 2.1 lb, lungs clear to auscultation mid-lobe, and edema reduced to +1. Education documentation reflected teach-back accuracy on medication regimen and sodium restriction. Care plan updated to address long-term heart failure clinic referral.

One goal was only partially met by the 36-hour mark: the potassium level, initially low at 3.4 mEq/L, remained below the target range after the first round of diuresis, since loop diuretics like furosemide accelerate potassium loss alongside fluid loss. The evaluation documents this as an open item requiring a potassium supplement order and a repeat basic metabolic panel before discharge, rather than closing out the electrolyte concern prematurely just because the primary symptoms had improved.

Unlock Full Assignment

Want to see the complete assignment with all details, analysis, and solutions?

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What condition does this nursing care plan sample address?

The sample care plan addresses congestive heart failure, including NANDA nursing diagnoses, SMART outcomes, NIC interventions, and evidence-based rationales.

2. Can I download this CHF care plan, or do I need a custom version?

Both options are available. You can use the CHF care plan sample directly, or request a custom nursing care plan for a different condition.

3. Are the NANDA diagnoses prioritized correctly in this care plan?

Yes, the diagnoses follow standard NANDA prioritization based on Maslow's hierarchy and immediate patient safety concerns relevant to CHF management.

4. Do the interventions include evidence-based rationales?

Yes, every NIC intervention is paired with an evidence-based rationale explaining why that specific intervention supports the stated SMART outcome.

5. Can a U.S. nurse educator help build a custom care plan for a different diagnosis?

Yes, our U.S.-based nurse educators can build a fully custom nursing care plan for any diagnosis your specific course assignment requires.